Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Just say NO to fluoridation


Sept. 11, 2012

Re:  Fluoridating our water
           
Dear Mayor Sam Adams & City of Portland Commissioners: 

I am writing to let you know that I DO NOT support the effort by Randy Leonard and Mayor Sam Adams to put fluoride in our wonderful city water supply.  Good thing neither of you is running because I will never vote for you again. 

First of all, this should not be a rush decision or something that should be done behind closed doors.  We need city-wide dialogue with a public vote. We should have the choice of what to put in our bodies. 

I do not come at this as someone who is afraid of fluoride.  Although I am a native-Portlander, I lived for 10 years in cities with fluoridated water (Chicago & Atlanta).    

There are several reasons I do not support putting fluoride in our water.

1)  Fluoride is toxic.  It is a byproduct of industrial fertilizer manufacturing processes.  If companies had to dispose of it they’d have to dispose of it as “TOXIC WASTE”.  Why is there a loophole that allows them to sell it to municipalities to put in our water supplies in the name of public health?! 

2) Only 5% of the world’s water supply is fluoridated.  Since the 1970s, many governments have refused to fluoridate their water.

According to an Aug. 1988 article in Chemical and Engineering News, by B. Hilleman:  “The Danish Minister of Environment recommended against fluoridation in 1977 because "no adequate studies had been carried out on its long-term effects on human organ systems other than teeth and because not enough studies had been done on the effects of fluoride discharges on freshwater ecosystems."

"In 1978, the West German Association of Gas & Water Experts rejected fluoridation for legal reasons and because 'the so-called optimal fluoride concentration of 1 mg per L is close to the dose at which long-term damage [to the human body] is to be expected.' "

Contrary to what fluoride supports have said in the media, there are studies that show that fluoridation chemicals are unsafe. A broad spectrum of scientific studies in top scientific journals and from credible researchers show serious reasons to be concerned about fluoride’s role in everything from decreased IQ in children to increased risks of bone fracture in the elderly.  The 2006 report by the National Academy of Sciences is likely the single best resource that summarizes many of these studies.  You can find more about these studies on http://www.cleanwaterportland.org/ or the Fluoride Action Network’s website:  http://www.fluoridealert.org/

3) Fluoride’s proponents say we have a dental health crisis in Portland, however, based on actual numbers Portland kids actually have the lowest cavities in our state and rank as having the 15th lowest cavity rate in the United States when compared to states with fluoridated water. 

These numbers from Clean Water Portland’s fact sheet are telling:  The percentage of Portland metro children that have had a cavity is 54%, compared to 70% of children outside of Portland. (2007 Smile survey at p. 12) This is true even though only roughly 8% of the Portland metro area is fluoridated, but roughly 33% of Oregon residents outside Portland metro are fluoridated.  Portland metroʼs cavity rate is actually so much lower than the rest of the state, we bring down the statewide average to 66.3%.

How do we compare to the rest of the states? Also from the Clean Water Portland fact sheet:  “Portlandʼs children would rank as having the 15th lowest rate of “cavities experiences” in the U.S. (CDC Caries Experience data3, New York state ranked 15th with 54.1%). This is true despite the high fluoridation rates in many states.

The percentage of Portland metro children with untreated decay is 21%, compared to 44% outside of Portland and 35.4% statewide. (2007 Smile survey at p. 12) While thereʼs always room for improvement, the Portland metro area has already met the 2010 National Oral Health Objectives for rates of untreated decay (21%).”

Yes, childhood cavities may be increasing over the last several decades.  But I believe that is because of our diet – prepackaged foods and too many sodas.  Not to mention how many of our schools have soda vending machines. 

We don’t need fluoride in our water.  If the City of Portland would like to deal with children’s dental needs the priorities should be:  getting fresh food for families of all income levels; getting rid of soda pop and other sugar beverages (including the chocolate and other flavored milk) in our schools; and access to affordable dental and healthcare for everyone. 

4) I’ve lived and traveled all over this country and Portland has the best-tasting water.  Let’s keep it that way, please.    

Thank you to Commissioners Amanda Fritz and Dan Saltzman for keeping an open mind on this issue.   

I urge you to give voters an open, intelligent, dialogue and vote on this issue.  

Sincerely,
HW

Friday, February 01, 2008

Letter to Gov. Kulongoski, Treasurer Edwards, our Utilities & Congress People

To the Honorable Governor Kulongoski & others who it may concern (hard copies have been sent),

I am writing this letter in opposition to the proposed Liquid Natural Gas terminals in Oregon. I work on Weds., Feb. 6, so am unable to attend the rally against LNG & thought I’d send my protest via mail.

To build a pipeline, some of it must go through private lands. Conservatives bitch when the government uses Eminent Domain to cheaply buy land; yet this is exactly what the energy companies want to do for the LNG pipeline. And Bush’s energy bill from 2005 would allow it, while the State of Oregon & local governments would have little say in the matter. That is not okay! This is our state! The Feds & OUTSIDE corporations should not be able to override local, state decisions.

California decided they didn’t want to build these terminals in their own state. They don’t want to mar their beautiful state; not when they can get it from their nearest neighbor (just like they do so much of their water).

Why should Oregon have the UGLY terminals & the pipeline in our beautiful state? Why should we destroy our ocean front, estuaries and other natural areas (possibly even having to build more roads in formerly roadless areas of our mountains, which you have saved in the past)? If California wants & needs more LNG, let them find another way to get it.

Oregon citizens will not benefit financially or even get to use the bulk of the energy from the LNG terminals.

Another worry is that the energy companies aren’t going to add the rotten egg scent the gas, so if there’s a leak, we’re not going to know about it until it’s too late. And much of the pipeline will be going through earthquake country, which would increase the risk of leaks.

No precaution or risk assessment can guarantee safety in case of accident, earthquake, or terrorism. According to documents from the California Energy Commission in July 2003, "an ignited LNG vapor cloud or large LNG pool fire can cause extensive damage to life and property.”

And what happens if it spills into our waterways? According to Professor Jerry Havens, a chemical engineer and director of the Chemical Hazards Research Center at the University of Arkansas who helped write federal standards for estimating the size and intensity of fires involving LNG: “if about 3 million gallons of LNG spills onto the water from an LNG tanker ship, flammable vapors from the spill could travel up to 3 miles."

Even the National Marine Fisheries Service urges the U.S. Army corps of Engineers to deny the permit for the Bradwood Landing project near Astoria. In the letter, Tehan outlined seven reasons to deny the permit, including discrepancies between NorthernStar's project descriptions and the Corps' public notice, as well as possible threats to fish habitats posed by the dredging. The NMFS letter is available in the FERC eLibrary under Docket No. CP06-365.

You want to make Oregon a leader in following the Kyoto Protocols and reducing our greenhouse admissions. LNG will only increase our emissions of CO2. How do you propose to counter balance those emissions from the LNG terminals?

There are better alternatives, both economically and environmentally.

Wind generators are LESS EXPENSIVE and FASTER to build than LNG terminals, coal-fired, or nuclear power generators. Not to mention that windmills are clean and the wind is in no danger of being used up. Then there’s solar power. And who knows what other possibilities haven’t even been invented yet.

Oregon should be a leader in conserving our natural resources & looking for renewable utility options for our future (such as wind turbines). We must think of our children & our children’s Children.

There are no benefits to allowing LNG terminals & pipelines here in Oregon. I hope you change your mind about your support of LNG. Please don’t issue permits for projects that are not needed in Oregon & that won’t benefit our State. Let’s be true to our green & forward thinking, pioneering spirit.

**************************************************************************************

Friends who feel as I do, if you can, attend the Rally (information to follow). If not, write or call your representatives in the State & National level.

Rally Information:
Wednesday, February 6th-
Rally and Lobby Day - NO LNG (Liquidified Natural Gas ) IN OREGON
11 a.m. - 2 p.m. Capitol Steps, Salem

SPEAKERS, MUSIC, and INFORMATION
Join people from around the state in protesting the imposition of a corporate agenda on the people and public lands in Oregon. Liquified Natural Gas proposals in Oregon (at Astoria, Columbia River, & Coos Bay) threaten the livelihoods and lives of citizens throughout the state and there never has been a good reason given for it. The gas is destined for the California market where the gas
industry has been rebuffed at every turn to put a facility on their coast.
The resulting pipeline to California (where most of the gas is destined) will use eminent domain to acquire the right of way from reluctant landowners. Using LNG will only delay the necessary changes away from fossil fuels that are absolutely necessary to respond to the global warming problem. Final siting decisions are made by the Federal Energy Regulatory Agency whose members are personally appointed by George Bush and Dick Cheney.

NO LOCAL DECISIONS ARE ALLOWED TO HALT THIS PROCESS AND EMINENT DOMAIN IS THEFT TO ENABLE CORPORATE PROFITS. JOIN US TO LOBBY YOUR LEGISLATORS AND GOVERNOR IN OREGON TO DEMAND THEY REFUSE TO UTILIZE PUBLIC RESOURCES TO AID THIS PROCESS. TELL THEM TO DEMAND SOVEREIGNTY OVER OREGON.

For more information: email nolngrally@verizon.net

The rally is sponsored by: Ratepayers for Affordable Clean Energy (RACE), Oregon chapter Sierra Club, Pacific Green Party of Oregon, F.L.O.W., Oregon Wild, Citizens Against LNG, Landowners and Citizens for a Safe Community, Columbia River Keeper, and many others.

Labels: ,

Friday, November 30, 2007

Political Diahrrea

Have you heard about the "Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act"? It was voted on in October but the mainstream media has been mum. I just heard about it on KBOO (a community-sponsored radio station).

From democracynow.org:

"A little-noticed anti-terrorism bill quietly making its through Congress is raising fears of a new affront on activism and constitutional rights. The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act was passed in an overwhelming 400 to six House vote last month. Critics say it could herald a new government crackdown on dissident activity and infiltration of universities under the guise of fighting terrorism. The bill would establish two government-appointed bodies to study, monitor and propose ways of curbing what it calls homegrown terrorism and extremism in the United States. The first body, a National Commission, would convene for eighteen months. A university-based "Center for Excellence" would follow, bringing together academic specialists to recommend laws and other measures.

Critics say the bill's definition of "extremism" and "terrorism" is too vague and its mandate even more broad. Under a false veil of expertise and independence, the government-appointed commissions could be used as ideological cover to push through harsher laws."

One of the potentially vague definitions they added is "force" as in violence & force. They could easily consider a SIT-IN or tree-sitting as force & thus you become a terrorist. Apparently some people are "terrorized" by someone with a different opinion & values. And here I thought that Thought Crimes only were plots in novels and movies.

Whoa, I just noticed what the # of the bill is. Ironically, it’s HR 1955. 1955-that's during the MCCarthy Era - an era the NEOCONS would no doubt love to take us back to almost as much as they want to bring on the "End Times". Just read up on McCarthyism (this term was coined on March 29 – that’s my birthday!) & found out 1955 is toward the end of the era. Could this be an omen?

Only 6 members of the House voted Nay on this bill. Three Republicans & three Democrats. Kudos to Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), Jerry Costello (D-IL), John Duncan (R-TN), Jeff Flake (D-AZ), & Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA). Ron Paul was one of 22 members of the house didn’t vote on HR 1955.

Thank God for the 1% of elected Republicans with brains.
I could so go on about whatever happened to following their platform. They seem to have lost the “conserve” that makes them conservative & now give everything to corporations (Italy’s Mussolini called this FACISCM). Big government is bad but it’s fucking okay to have big CORPORATIONS? Of course, there’s no profit in government. What are you thinking Republicans? I’m so disappointed in you. You do not deserve to be called Republicans. You are not standing for the Republic. And Democrats, you are just as guilty.

Of course, all of Oregon’s Congresspeople voted for the bill. WTF? The Republicans I expected but not progressive Dems like DeFazio & Blumenauer. WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? Did you actually read the entire bill? You are so going to hear from me about this as soon as I finish this blog.

Further information on HR 1955:
Text of HR 1955

Find out how your Congressperson voted

So are we gonna just sit there & let our REPUBLIC slide into fascism or are we gonna do something?

Speaking of Kucinich & Ron Paul, according to a Cleveland Plain Dealer blog during a New Hampshire speech, Kucinich said, "I'm thinking about Ron Paul" as a running mate. A Kucinich-Paul administration could bring people together "to balance the energies in this country.”

The two disagree on abortion, healthcare, & size of government but they have two big areas of agreement. Both campaign on getting our troops out of Iraq & staying out of the affairs of other countries. Another similarity, both Paul & Kucinich also frequently cite the Constitution as providing the authority for their agendas. Paul never votes for legislation unless the measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution, his campaign says. Kucinich keeps a pocket-size copy of the Constitution handy, brandishing it to invoke authority for such proposals as the impeachment of Vice President Cheney, one of Kucinich's signature issues.

Doesn’t sound like Ron Paul is as willing as Kucinich. "Dr. Paul and Rep. Kucinich are friends and there is a lot of mutual respect," Paul communications director Jesse Benton said in an e-mail when asked whether a running-mate spot on the Kucinich ticket would be attractive to Paul. "They have worked, and will continue to work, together on the ending the war and protecting civil liberties.

"However, Ron wants to substantially cut the size and scope of the federal government. There are too many differences on issues such as taxes and spending to think a joint ticket would be possible."

I’m open to a Kucinich – Paul ticket (they are the two most interesting candidates & definitely idealists), although I’m sure the thought makes my friend Paul cringe!

It’s an interesting thought. Have we ever had a Democrat & Republican on the same ticket in a presidential election? Originally the presidential candidates receiving the second-largest number of electoral votes became Vice President. According to wikipedia.com in 1797-1801 John Adams, a Federalist, was president & Thomas Jefferson, Democratic-Republican, was vice president.

The problematic election of 1800, where Jefferson & Burr tied, led to the passage of The Twelfth Amendment in 1804. This changed the system so that the electoral college voted separately for president and vice president. Over time the presidential candidate gained power over the nominating convention to choose his own running mate & thus we have the elections we have today.

On a side note, while reading up on this I found out that Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican. The last Democratic-Republican was John Quincy Adams in 1829. Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) was the first Democratic President. No wonder I can’t tell the two parties apart anymore. I’ve always suspected that the two parties were the same. Hee, hee!

Back to my original thought, maybe it’s time we try something new. Obviously the current method is not working. We have been divided & conquered. Government will never solve anything otherwise all the politicians will be out of a job. Community action & involvement is the only thing that can solve our problems.

To that end, it’s time we set aside our differences & worked to make positive changes in this country. Think of all we could achieve if we worked together on what we have in common! We can’t have everything we want, that’s why there’s compromise. We need to go back to basics & then start from there. What’s important to us? Life? Liberty? The pursuit of happiness? Education? Healthy & safe citizens?

Since we’re on the subject of presidential nominees, here’s yet another reason (among the many) to not vote for Hillary. Hillary Clinton has received $52,600 in campaign donations from the MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. She was the largest recipient of donations of any of the candidates. With that kind of backing don’t expect her to change the way our government works & to get us out of Iraq (and other country’s affairs for that matter).

According to The Huffington Post, “An examination of contributions of $500 or more, using the Huffington Post's Fundrace website, shows that employees of the top five arms makers - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics -- gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900, with only $86,800 going to Republicans.

Senator Clinton took in $52,600, more than half of the total going to all Democrats, and a figure equaling 60 percent of the sum going to the entire GOP field. Her closest competitor for defense industry money is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (R.), who raised $32,000.”

This is a turn around from the past decade, where Republicans were the favored recipients of Defense donations. In the 2004 election Bush received over $819,000 in defense industry donations. This is more than double the amount Kerry received ($366,000).

Also according to the Huffington Post article, “Clinton's major industry benefactors - donors who gave the $4,600 maximum allowed by law -- include Roger A. Crone, Boeing's president of Network and Space Systems; Stanley Roth, Boeing's Vice President for Asia, International Relations, $4,600; Anne Sullivan, a Raytheon attorney; William Lynn, Raytheon's Senior Vice President for Government Relations; and Michele Kang, Northrop Grumman Vice President for health science solutions.”

While searching the information in Hillary Clinton’s Federal Election Commission disclosure reports which list what individuals & committees have donated to her campaign I ran across some surprising data. The Michigan Republican Party has donated $4,587 to her. Another group, titled “Republican Issues Committee” has donated almost $50,000 to her this year. Must be because she’s was a college republican back in the day. That’s just plain weird!

HILLARY’s campaign motto ought to be “SHE WILL NOT BE UNBOUGHT.” Ha! I seriously should make this a bumper sticker.

This is nifty. You can look at numerous break downs of each candidate’s donations at opensecrets.org’s race for the White House. This is a totally cool tool! Very interesting to look at each candidate’s fundraising data. If you look at nothing else, look here.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Robobugs

I heard a news story on our community radio station this morning that captured my attention. Seems several sightings of robotic dragonflies have been made recently at numerous political events in New York & DC. No one is admitting that they have such technology but they have admitted to trying. Besides the nefarious, potential spying uses of the robobugs; they have a useful function...they can be sent into collapsed buildings to look for survivors. That's pretty cool. But you gotta know that they are going to use it for gathering information.

Here's the text of the article from the Washington Post on Tuesday:
Link to article & video

"Vanessa Alarcon saw them while working at an antiwar rally in Lafayette Square last month.

"I heard someone say, 'Oh my god, look at those,' " the college senior from New York recalled. "I look up and I'm like, 'What the hell is that?' They looked kind of like dragonflies or little helicopters. But I mean, those are not insects."

Robotic fliers have been used by the military since World War II, but in the past decade their numbers and level of sophistication have increased enormously.

Out in the crowd, Bernard Crane saw them, too.

"I'd never seen anything like it in my life," the Washington lawyer said. "They were large for dragonflies. I thought, 'Is that mechanical, or is that alive?' "

That is just one of the questions hovering over a handful of similar sightings at political events in Washington and New York. Some suspect the insectlike drones are high-tech surveillance tools, perhaps deployed by the Department of Homeland Security.

Others think they are, well, dragonflies -- an ancient order of insects that even biologists concede look about as robotic as a living creature can look.

No agency admits to having deployed insect-size spy drones. But a number of U.S. government and private entities acknowledge they are trying. Some federally funded teams are even growing live insects with computer chips in them, with the goal of mounting spyware on their bodies and controlling their flight muscles remotely.

The robobugs could follow suspects, guide missiles to targets or navigate the crannies of collapsed buildings to find survivors.

The technical challenges of creating robotic insects are daunting, and most experts doubt that fully working models exist yet.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

This may spoil your appetite: a review of “The End of food”

The End of Food by Thomas F. Pawlick (Dewey call #: 338.19 Pawlick)

In the 1930s, Russian dictator Joseph Stalin decided that farms needed to be organized along a mass-production basis. The Kulaks, or rural proprietors, resisted and thus they became enemies of the Revolution. Stalin employed brute force: farmers were arrested & shot or exiled to Siberia; crops were confiscated with no compensation, or burned in the fields. These tactics led to a famine with a death toll in the millions. Worst of all, it created a brain drain of Russian farmers; those who had worked the land for generations and who understood the land & local & regional products were killed. “Before this one-man disaster ended, more than 10 million individual Russian farm people were killed (p. 161).” To this day, Russian agriculture has not recovered.

Over here, in our Republic of the United States, we don’t have a totalitarian regime. We do have multi-national corporations & the Chicago school of Economics model. Since World War II, individual, family-run farms have been on the decline while corporate factory farms have risen. Under the Nixon administration plans were made to restructure American agriculture under the economic theory of “comparative advantage”. As Pawlick says in the book, “The idea was, basically, to convert the countryside into a vast, mass-producing grain factory – and later, under succeeding presidents, into factories manufacturing tomatoes, oranges or whatever else.” That is the free-market equivalent of collectivism. Today, only 20 large corporations control US poultry production (p. 166).

Family farms aren’t the only ones suffering. The quality of the produce & the meats we eat is declining; as is the health of land that our food is grown on.

Did you know that veggies & fruits contain FEWER nutrients than they did 50 years ago? Veggies & fruits in North America (Canada included) have less Vitamin A, C, iron & calcium. Of course, sodium is on the rise, as is the amount of chemicals in them (more on that in a moment).

As an example, take the potato (p. 15-16), as published by the Toronto Globe & Mail in 2002. “…The average spud, has lost 100% of its Vitamin A, which is important for good eyesight; 57% of its vitamin C and iron, a key component of healthy blood; and 28% of its calcium, essential for building healthy bones & teeth. It also lost 50% of its riboflavin and 18% of its thiamine. Of the seven key nutrients measured, only niacin levels have increased…the story is similar for 25 fruits and vegetables that were analyzed…”

The numbers in the article were based on food tables from the Canadian government & echo numbers published by the USDA tables.

Further eroding the nutritional value, mass-market tomatoes are ripened in rooms with concentrated doses of ethylene, a.k.a etephon, (p. 102). “According to Mozafar’s survey, multiple studies have shown that ‘vine-ripened fruits are higher in ascorbic acid (vitamin C) than those that are artificially ripened …. The reason for the relatively higher ascorbic acid in the vine versus artificially ripened tomatoes may be due to differences in the rate of ascorbic acid synthesis (or accumulation) in the fruits ripened differently. (p. 103)”

Vitamin C is significantly decreasing in America’s tomatoes, broccoli, and other produce. Vitamin A is down 43.3 percent in tomatoes, by 30.5 percent in tomato juice. Deficiency of Vitamin A rich foods can lead to night blindness, disease-prone children, shortness of breath, malnutrition, and scaly lumps on skin. GAHHH!

Eating free-range and organic foods are better for humans. "Eggs from free-range hens contain up to 30 percent more vitamin E, 50 percent more folic acid, and 30 percent more vitamin B12 than factory eggs (p.119)."

While vitamins & nutrients are declining, toxic additives & chemicals are on the rise in our foods. For years, the media has reported on the amounts & effects of the mercury in our fish & rBGH (bovine growth hormones) in our dairy products.

But did you also know that meat packers & supermarkets have taken to adding a chemical cocktail of things into our meat & selling them (for higher prices, of course) as “enhanced meat”? This mix can include water, salt (not a good thing for those on a sodium free diet), phosphates, antioxidants, & other flavorings. More information on enhanced meat. For more about meat packers, read “Fast Food Nation” by Eric Schlosser. I had to stop reading when I got to the meat packing section because the total disregard for their workers health & safety made me ill. It’s sad how how soulless some people are.

Then there are the pesticides in our food. A study “…analyzed samples from U.S. Food & Drug administration records and found that nearly half of the registered contaminates found in non-organic food samples were actually legally BANNED pesticides. ‘The 10 most contaminated foods were strawberries, bell peppers, spinach, cherries, peaches, cantaloupe, celery, apples, blackberries, and green peas.’” People who eat conventionally grown, non-organic foods, are at a higher risk of cancer & other deadly diseases.

The pesticide DDT has been banned in most industrialized countries. However, they are still finding traces of it in our food because the corporations that make it are still allowed to sell it. Some of our food is imported from countries where it’s still legal to use. Hopefully the usage is declining since the Stockholm Convention, ratified in 2001 and effective as of 17 May 2004, outlawed several persistent organic pollutants, and restricted the use of DDT to vector control. As of 2006, DDT continues to be used in other (primarily tropical) countries where mosquito-borne malaria and typhus are serious health problems. Use of DDT in public health to control mosquitoes is primarily done inside buildings and through inclusion in household products and selective spraying; this greatly reduces environmental damage compared to the earlier widespread use of DDT in agriculture (according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT).

Scientists haven’t really begun to study the effects on humans of the chemicals in our food; let alone, how those chemicals react to one another. Could the stuff in our food be reason we have rising rates of cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, & who knows what other diseases or illnesses? Who knows, maybe even some of Ben’s illness can be traced to chemicals in our food?

Interestingly some of the largest corporations that own factory farms are OIL and CHEMICAL Companies. Some of the big ones include: Cargill, Monsanto (a maker of a Agent Orange not to mention rBGH & several varieties of seeds), International Mineral & Chemical Corp, and Tenneco. They’ve got an economic imperative, “the bottom-line”, to use their own chemicals and seeds.

Many of the remaining smaller, non-corporate farms may have no say in how they farm their land. “Working land that may be heavily mortgaged, saddled with further debt from the purchase of machinery and inputs, they are often locked into ironbound contracts with food processors. The later provide them with the processors own proprietary seed varieties and may dictate everything from fertilizer, irrigation, and herbicide regimes to the time and method of harvest.”

This brings us to the term “proprietary seed varieties.” There are hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of different types of each veggie or fruit. Take the tomato. There are 5,500 kinds for home gardeners to choose from in the Seed Savers Exchange; but only 10 varieties are grown in California for mass marketing; the number is 11 in Florida; 15 for the whole of America. The corporate factory-farms will only grow the tomato(es) that meet these basic criteria (p. 10-11): yield (pounds/acre), uniformity of size/large size, uniformity of shape, firmness, resistance to disease, heat tolerance, uniformity in time of ripening (color).

Notice that the list does not include nutrition or, most important to my taste buds, taste. Trust me when I say that tomatoes & berries are better when you buy them from organic markets or farmers markets or you pick them yourself. We’ve been getting tomatoes from our Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) farm this summer & they have the most wonderful scent, while the tomatoes from Safeway are scentless, tasteless & in many cases rock-solid.

Modern agricultural practices are having an effect not only on our bodies but also on the land. Here’s the quick and dirty lowdown, if you want to know more the book has great information.
In modern farming the goal is to maximize production (mustn’t forget the bottom-line), so row after row of the same plants are planted. Crops aren’t rotated and the fields aren’t allowed to remain sallow for a year after growing. Under traditional farming methods, the depleted nitrogen would be replaced by planting a row of beans; but today chemical fertilizers are used to replace the nitrogen. These chemicals are expensive so the farms must continue to plant the high-yielding crop that will give them the greatest return on investment. With the same thing being grown constantly, noxious insects, which might have been deterred or killed when the crops were changed on an annual basis, become a problem and need to be kept through the use of herbicides and pesticides.

Irrigation is another big issue. Water is a huge issue in the Western US. There are sometimes fights over the use of rivers and other waterways for farming. California has used up much of its water (they drained one of the largest freshwater lakes in the US for irrigation) and has to buy additional water from various states (including Oregon) to irrigate large tracts of arid land during the hot summer months.

There is some evidence that shows that over-watering can adversely affect the nutrient quality of crops (p. 104); there’s a certain level of water needed beyond that nutrients start to drop. Commercial farms must over-water to maintain their high-yield crops and the size of the fruits and vegetables. “He {Mozafar} cites numerous studies showing that rainy climate is known to decrease vitamin C in turnip greens, rose hips, onions, feijoa fruits and black currants. He adds that ‘experiments conducted under controlled conditions have shown that increased water supply to plants may reduce the ascorbic acid concentration in cabbage, cauliflower, celery, cucumber, muskmelon, radish, snap beans, and tomatoes.’”

The level of water also affects the salinity of soil (p. 105). “Soils contain various kinds of mineral salts, a portion of which are dissolved in soil water. As they draw moisture from the ground, crops separate the water from the salts, leaving the latter concentrated in the soil. If a soil is already slightly saline to begin with, irrigating it and then sowing crops will tend to draw the salts up toward the surface, and concentrate them. If the climate in the area is hot, water evaporation will make the problem worse.” Data on the effect of salinity on vitamin content is limited (p. 106) but it has been shown to reduce ascorbic acid in cabbage, tomato and okra and reduces carotene concentration in radish, cabbage, lettuce and tomato.

Evidence, while not conclusive, points that mass-production agricultural methods are not the best for growing nutritional foods.

I feel very lucky to live in a state that is 88% small farms & only 1% corporate owned farms (this figure comes from an Oregonian article I read in August. I’m curious to know if this # counts the Tree & grass farms we have; those are two of Oregon’s big exports. Of course, not all of that percentage is organic. I’m also lucky to live in an area where many neighborhoods & most cities have weekly farmers markets. For the last two years, we’ve split a share of a Community Sponsored Agriculture (CSA) farm with another friend during the summer. We’ve also got a small garden in our backyard, which I’m hoping to enlarge. So hopefully we’re getting more nutrients than if we were purchasing from the big supermarkets.

Thank God we don’t have to stop eating. There are ways to get more nutrients in our food. Pawlick includes 4 chapters of solutions. For those who don’t want to read the book (although I highly recommend it), here’s what you can do:

Support your local farmers - shop at farmers markets or join a CSA
Know what you are eating – ask questions, see where is it grown if you can, are they truly certified organic (some places fudge this a bit, maybe Jeremy can comment on this, he knows quite a bit about permaculture)
Grow your Own – that way you know what’s in it & it’s actually rather fun
Eat at restaurants that use local, organic produce

Good websites for more information:
Eatwild.com

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Whitehouse blasts Gonzales over Cheney Access to DOJ

I love the irony in that sentence. But I didn't say The Whitehouse, it actually refers to Freshman Senator & Democrat from Rhode Island, Sheldon Whitehouse. He is member of the Senate Judiciary Committee looking into the Department of Justice, the Attorney General & the Bush admin. Go WHITEHOUSE! Now that's what our Congresspeople SHOULD BE doing. Protecting our REPUBLIC & upholding our Constitution!

According to the The Raw Story: "During Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, a freshman Democratic Senator stumped Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on how Vice President Dick Cheney, his chief of staff, and counsel, had been granted authority parallel with the President on intervening in pending matters at the Justice Department.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) questioned the Attorney General about the independence of the Justice Department and communications with the White House on pending cases or investigations.

He then pointed to a May 4, 2006 memorandum signed by Gonzales which showed that the Office of the Vice President had been granted parallel privileges with the Executive Office of the President on communicating directly with the Justice Department's staff on criminal and civil matters.

"What - on earth - business does the Office of the Vice President have in the internal workings of the Department of Justice with respect to criminal investigations, civil investigations, and ongoing matters?" the Senator asked.

Gonzales was stumped, "As a general matter, I would say that's a good question."

Whitehouse then pointed out that in the same memo, the Chief of Staff and Counsel of the Vice President were also explicitly granted the same authority.

"On its face - I must say - sitting here, I'm troubled by this," Gonzales added. ..."

I'm sure he's saying that because his back is against a wall.

Speaking of Darth Cheney, I was curious about what was happening on Dennis Kucinich's attempt to impeach Cheney (U.S. Resolution 333).

According to Wikipedia.com's Dennis Kucinich article: "As of July 16, 2007, thirteen other Congressional representatives have become co-sponsors. Three of these are members of the House Judiciary Committee." *Heather's note: Those three are Maxine Walters of CA, Keither Ellison of Minn., & Hank Johnson from Georgia. Other supporters are from: NY, Missouri, Ohio, Washington, Virginia, Illinois & Maryland. Sadly, Oregon has ZERO congresspeople who've become co-sponsors. I'll have to call my politicos yet again.

None of the Democrat's Presidential nominees have expressed support. Also according to Wikipedia, during the first Democratic Presidential debate at South Carolina State University, none of the other candidates' hands went up when the moderator, Brian Williams, asked if they would support Kucinich's plan to impeach Cheney. How typical of the Dem's to play pussy.

Where it is now:

The resolution has been referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, chaired by Congressman Jerrold Nadler.

Neither the subcommittee nor the full Judiciary Committee, chaired by Congressman John Conyers, has yet scheduled a hearing on the resolution. Absent a positive referral from the Judiciary Committee, the only way the resolution could reach the floor of the House is with the approval of the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.

Failure of the Judiciary Committee and Speaker Pelosi to act favorably would result in the resolution remaining in committee indefinitely, where it would never receive a vote.

Find out more on wikipedia

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Couldn've said it better myself

Keith Olbermann op-ed about the whole Scooter Libby thing. I definitely could not have said it better, so I'll just post it here. He even quotes JOhn Wayne, an ultra-conservative.



In other news, Dennis Kucinich is still pushing for the IMPEACHMENT OF DICK CHENEY. Contact your Congressperson if you support the impeachment process.

Also, Cindy Sheehan has challenged Nancy Pelosi for her job. On July 8, 2007 she announced that she will run against Speaker Pelosi if she fails to introduce articles of impeachment against President Bush. Go Sheehan! I admire your courage to speak out in a country where it's not popular to speak up against Big Brother.