Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Gingrich: "Insurgents in CT"

Newt Gingrich was on Fox news & said "Third, you have what I think is a legitimate insurgency in Connecticut, which needs to be met head on and debated head on, which is people who say this is so hard, it is so frightening, it’s so painful, can’t we come home and hide? And I think if Lamont wins next Tuesday, it will be the beginning of extraordinarily important period in American politics, and in American history. For all of us to have this debate. How dangerous are the terrorists? How dangerous are the dictatorships? And what does America have to do in that kind of a dangerous world?"

Insurgency in Connecticut?

Since when did protestors or people speaking out against government policies become insurgents. This is what our forefathers & most of our countrymen for over 200 years called "FREEDOM OF SPEECH".

Newt, maybe you've heard of this concept? See Amendment I of the Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..." Pay close attention to the next section here, it's important, "or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peacably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances."

See also, Amendment XVII of the Constitution: "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, elected by the PEOPLE thereof,..." This also applies to the House of Representatives in Article I of the Constitution. Why is Newt even commenting on this race, he's not a citizen of Connecticut that I know of. Last time I checked he was from Georgia.

This is just a blatant attempt by Republicans to redefine anyone who disagrees with the government as insurgents. From here it's just a hop, skip & a jump from Republic to dictatorship with secret police; the torture & disappearance of those unsavory citizens who may disagree with the government; & the fixing of elections.

1 Comments:

At 12:45 PM , Blogger eclecticlady said...

Aye!

I say we also ship out Bush, Cheney, Condi, & all the administration & their children too! Since they understand the whole situation much better than we all do, they'd be much better on the ground in Iraq than here. Plus, then we wouldn't need to use the stop gap measures to keep our soldiers in over the tour of duty.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home